The gloves appear to be well and truly off after Prince Harry’s latest foray into American late-night television and political humour. What was framed as a light-hearted, scripted comedy sketch on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert has quickly spiralled into something far more sensitive — and potentially far more consequential.

The Duke of Sussex (Pictured on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert) made a series of jibes while he served as a surprise guest speaker at the BABC lunch on Friday

During the appearance, Harry joked that Americans had “elected a king,” a clear dig at Donald Trump that echoed the recent “No Kings” protests. He also wandered into territory that many believe a former working royal should avoid entirely, touching on U.S. immigration policy and mocking America’s fascination with royalty. The studio audience laughed, booed, and applauded on cue — but behind the scenes, the reaction has been far less forgiving.

Royal watchers point out that this was not just another celebrity cameo. Harry is not a private American citizen with no ties elsewhere. He remains the son of the British monarch, and his words carry diplomatic weight whether he wants them to or not. One former palace aide described the segment as “another example of Harry forgetting that jokes don’t exist in a vacuum when you’re still royal by blood.”

Prince Harry’s Latest Interview Gets Dragged Into Lawsuit – Newsweek

The timing has only intensified the controversy. Trump has previously made thinly veiled threats regarding Harry’s immigration status, particularly after the duke admitted past recreational drug use in his memoir Spare. While legal experts have repeatedly stressed that Harry has no criminal convictions and that the visa debate has been exaggerated, the political theatre surrounding it has never fully died down.

That is why some insiders believe Harry’s latest remarks were a risky gamble. “Trump doesn’t forget, and he doesn’t let things slide,” one U.S. political commentator noted. “Even when he laughs something off publicly, there’s usually a ledger somewhere.” Whether that ledger translates into action remains to be seen, but the unease is palpable.

Trump’s speech on combating inflation turns to grievances about immigrants : NPR

What has raised eyebrows even further is the sudden shift in Harry’s apparent priorities. According to sources familiar with the couple’s plans, Harry is now accelerating arrangements for a return to the UK — notably without Meghan Markle. Officially, there is no dramatic explanation. Unofficially, speculation is running rampant.

Some observers believe the move is practical, tied to legal, diplomatic, or family considerations. Others are far less charitable. “When the temperature rises in America, Harry has always had Britain as a fallback,” one veteran royal correspondent remarked. “The irony is that he spent years insisting he needed to escape the UK, yet keeps circling back when things get uncomfortable.”

The absence of Meghan has become the loudest detail. Supporters argue that separate travel is nothing unusual and that Meghan has her own commitments. Critics, however, see symbolism. In their view, Harry returning alone feeds into a growing narrative that the duke is increasingly isolated — politically exposed in the U.S. and emotionally untethered from the institution he left behind.

There is also the question of identity. Harry has spent the last four years insisting he wants to be “just Harry,” yet every punchline he delivers depends on the audience knowing he is not. One PR strategist described it as an unsustainable contradiction. “You can’t mock your own privilege while relying on it to get applause,” they said. “Eventually, the joke stops landing.”

The diplomatic stakes are not trivial. Britain’s relationship with the United States has just weathered a high-profile state visit, and senior royals are acutely aware of how easily a stray comment can complicate matters. One constitutional expert warned that Harry’s remarks, though framed as comedy, risk blurring the line between personal opinion and perceived royal interference.

Meanwhile, Trump’s response — or lack thereof — has become part of the drama. Allies of the former president suggest he is unlikely to respond publicly unless pressed, but that does not mean Harry’s comments have gone unnoticed. “Silence doesn’t mean forgiveness,” a Republican strategist said pointedly.

As speculation swirls, the central question remains unresolved: has Harry finally misjudged the room? What began as a jokey television appearance has reopened old wounds, revived old threats, and reignited debate over where Harry truly belongs — geographically, politically, and symbolically.

For now, all eyes are on his next move. A quiet return to the UK without Meghan may calm the immediate storm, or it may only deepen the questions surrounding his future. One thing is certain: the era of consequences-free quips appears to be over. And whether Harry likes it or not, the world is once again reminding him that a prince never really stops being political.